Yawn.
You’re probably (definately) aware of this program that starts tonight with Billie Piper in it, called Secret Diaries of a Call Girl. It’s on BBC3 or ITV2 or something else that isn’t good enogh for the proper channels, and, like most TV shows with this much hype (see Heroes), it’s likely to be shit.
It’s got Billie Piper, for god’s sake. No-one with teeth that can double as a runway for small aircraft could possibly come accross as sexy. Instantly, the show’s main draw - there’s sex in it, although probably still mostly-clothed and not so much as a handful of visible boob - is lost, except for frustrated 14-year-olds. Which was probably the target audience in the first place. So it can’t be that bad.
But anyway, it’s actually based on a blog, by shady prostitute-type ‘Belle de Jour’ (not her real name, becasue only cool people hide their identities on the internet). Since every newspaper, TV guide, magazine, website, billboard, terrestial TV channel advert break and banner attached to the back of a low-flying aeroplane has made this show the most important thing since a four-year-old girl nobody has ever met, I decided to read said blog.
Since this blog has been the Guardian’s Blog of the Year and has since spawned two books (well, with recognition like an award from the Guardian, people must have been breaking down her door for book deals), you’d expect some top-notch writing.
Bullshit. It’s not the worst blog I’ve ever read, but I fail to see how this would make good TV. Or good literature. Or a good blog. It’s the whole “Diary” thing I am know to despise, except with the words “cornflakes for breakfast” replaced with “cock”. Yawn. At one point she compares potential boyfriends, calling them “Bachelor Candidates” or something. Snore. Why am I reading an issure of Bliss magazine with more swearing? The Times said it was “witty and intelligent”. Choice quote:
“I’d rather be peed on than give a blowjob. Fact”
Wow. I wish I could write like that.
If you’re a 14-year-old boy, don’t expect any grot, either. Any reference to what is supposed to be her former job (because, as much as she says she enjoyed it and as much as she looks down on anyone who disagrees, she’d much rather live off her book deals after having spent months hunched over a computer) is limited to something about the conversation with a certain client prior to him telling her to “suck him”.
Is this supposed to be offensive or something? I’ve been more outraged over the price of cookies at secondary school. No, whilst she posseses the whole “Up yours” demeanor to her detractors, as if acting like she doesn’t care will shield her from criticism, this isn’t offensive or shocking. It’s something even worse: boring.
The only point where I though “Nuts to you, bitch” rather than “I’m hungry” was when she was reacting to the controversy surrounding the Billie Piper program:
“Unless you’re a sex worker or knows a sex worker intimately, you’ve got no. Fucking. Clue”
No shit? Whilst not all of us have the pride and integrity to take up a career in writing about who we sleep with, by your logic, only the Nazis are allowed to express their thoughts and opinions on fascism. Sex workers don’t own the opinion on sex working, just like Belle de Jour doesn’t own the opinion on immeasuarble dullness.



