I don’t like calling this blog a blog. I’d prefer using the phrase “site” or “page”. I could probably get a proper domain, but I’m not nearly lame enough to know HTML and, since the ownership of a modem seems to have a negative effect on people’s intelligence, I’d probably get people coming here and wondering why I don’t update anymore.
Anyway, the reason I don’t like the word ‘blog’ is because it brings to mind the millions of poorly spelt, unreadable shit-fests that anyone with a connection and an email address can create in minutes. The ones on my blogroll, although seldom updated, happen to be written by some of the most intelligent, articulate people I know. Unfortunately, I think these are 5 of about 6 (including mine) decently-written ‘blogs’ on the internet.
However, there is a word with even more negative connotations - Livejournal.
I’ve only seen about, ooh, far too many Livejournals in my time, and they can be easily distinguished from a blog in two ways:
1- The constant need of the author to call it their “Livejournal”. Hold down Ctrl and press F, then search for the word “Livejournal” or, more effectively, “LJ”. Both the users and designers of Livejournal are determined to point out that NO! THIS ISN’T JUST A BLOG - IT’S LIVEJOURNAL! Get over yourself. It’s a blog, like every other one on the internet, only in fancier packaging. Like a iPod is just an mp3 player, stop with the pretentiously ‘arty’ adverts already.
2- There’s an ad in the top right of this (urgh) blog. I admit it. But one time I went on someone’s Livejournal and there were 3 in the top 2 inches alone. Two banners, both flashing to the point where they could cause epileptic fits, and one square thats about the same size as my annoying little one. It won’t make you flop around on the floor until you swallow your tongue, but it’s still taking up valuable space that could be used for something more useful, like, say, photos of the same tree from 12 different angles.
You’ve probably noticed that I’m taking the time to type ‘Livejournal’ each time, rather than just ‘LJ’. That’s because, to put it bluntly, ‘LJ’ is stupid. Like the phrase ‘D of E’ annoys me, abbreviating something that can be said properly with only a couple of extra syllables is all kinds of dumb. Why don’t I call this a ‘BG’? Save some time, because, like all the other teenagers who have LJs, I’m extremely busy with all my 16-year-old-type activities, such as writing on my BG. Blimey, I’m surprised people like me have time to think with our 16-hour school weeks and parent-provided food, hence why we have to save time by using phrases like ‘LJ’. Wank.